Blueprint · Monitoring & Intelligence · Difficulty: Intermediate · 22 min read
A practical, no-code blueprint for PR, comms, and marketing operators who want an AI agent that watches the news for mentions of their company and executives, filters out the noise, and delivers a clean daily briefing – without paying $15,000 a year for a legacy monitoring suite.
Summary Card
- What it does: Pulls news and web mentions of your company name and a list of executive names, runs them through an AI classifier for relevance and sentiment, de-duplicates near-identical stories, and delivers a daily briefing to Slack, email, or a shared doc
- Who it’s for: PR and comms managers, marketing operators, investor relations leads, founders, and agency account leads who need reliable media coverage tracking without an enterprise tool budget
- Time to implement: 45 minutes for the manual version; 2-3 hours for the fully automated daily briefing
- Tools required: Google News + Bing News + a few RSS feeds (free), ChatGPT or Claude for classification and writing, Make or n8n for automation, Slack or Gmail for delivery
- Cost estimate: $20/month for the manual workflow; $30-60/month for the fully automated version; $0 if you already have an enterprise monitoring tool and just want the AI layer on top
- Difficulty: Intermediate – no code, but you will configure a few automation modules and refine your search queries over 2-3 iterations
- Last tested: April 2026 with Claude Sonnet 4, ChatGPT 5.3, Make, and n8n
What the market looks like in 2026
Legacy media monitoring suites like Meltwater, Cision, and Muck Rack still dominate large-enterprise PR budgets, with pricing that typically starts around $10,000 per year and climbs from there. For smaller comms teams and solo operators, that math has never worked. The gap used to be filled by Google Alerts and a lot of manual scrolling. In 2026, a capable AI agent stitched together from free news APIs, RSS, and a Claude or GPT classifier can cover 80 percent of what those enterprise tools do for coverage tracking – minus the licensed print and paywalled archive access, which matters for some teams and not for others. This blueprint shows you exactly how to build that agent.
Every comms lead I talk to has the same problem. They need to know when their company is mentioned in the press, when their CEO gets quoted in a trade publication, and when a competitor picks a fight in a podcast – and they need to know it fast. But the tools that do this well cost more than their entire content budget, and the cheap tools (Google Alerts, free tiers of Mention.com) miss half the coverage and surface a pile of junk for the other half.
The workaround used to be an intern with a Google Doc. In 2026 there is a better answer. A well-designed AI agent can handle the full loop – collecting mentions from multiple sources, filtering out irrelevant noise (same company name, different company), classifying sentiment, grouping duplicates, and writing a one-page briefing your leadership team can actually read. You still have to set it up thoughtfully, and you still have to decide how to handle paywalled coverage. This blueprint walks through all of it.
How the Media Monitoring Agent Works – Architecture Overview
Before we build anything, here is the shape of what you are building. The agent has five stages. Each stage is independent, which means you can start manual and automate one piece at a time.
The Five-Stage Media Monitoring Workflow
Entity List
Define what you’re watching
Collect
Pull from news sources
Classify
Filter and tag with AI
Summarize
De-dupe and brief
Deliver
Slack, email, doc
The entity list is the brain of the system. Get it right and everything downstream is cleaner. Get it wrong and you will spend an hour a day deleting false positives. Most teams underinvest in this step and pay for it every day after.
Step 1: Build Your Entity List – Company and Executive Targets
Start here, even if you are tempted to skip ahead. The entity list is a structured document that tells your agent exactly what to watch for and what to ignore. It has two parts: a company block and an executive block. Each entry needs variants, disambiguators, and exclusions.
The Company Block
Your company probably shows up in the news with three or four different spellings. The legal name, the brand name, the ticker symbol if you are public, and the casual short form. You need all of them. You also need the things that look like your company but are not – the false positives that will otherwise drown your feed.
Entity List Template – Company Block
COMPANY: Acme Robotics Primary name: "Acme Robotics" Name variants (include all spellings and short forms): "Acme Robotics, Inc." "Acme Robotics Inc" "Acme" [short form - high false-positive risk] "ACME" [all caps - trade press often uses this] "$ACME" [ticker] Disambiguators (must appear near the name for "Acme" alone to count): "robotics" OR "automation" OR "warehouse" OR "Dallas" OR "CEO Sarah Chen" Exclusions (kill the match if any of these appear): "Acme Corporation" (the unrelated holding company in Ohio) "Wile E. Coyote" (cartoon references) "Acme Brick" (different company, Texas) "Acme Markets" (grocery chain) Products and initiatives to also track: "Acme Fleet OS" "Acme R-7 robot" "Project Beacon" [internal codename that leaked in a TechCrunch story]
The exclusions list is the part everyone forgets. If your company shares a name with anything else – a different business, a movie reference, a historical figure, a common English word – you need to list those explicitly so the classifier in Step 3 can drop them. Spend 20 minutes on this. It pays for itself the first day the agent runs.
The Executive Block
Executive tracking is where the false positives get really bad. “Sarah Chen” is a common name in the United States. Without disambiguators, you will get results for a Sarah Chen who is a figure skater, a Sarah Chen who is a cookbook author, and a Sarah Chen who is a state representative in Oregon. None of them are your CEO.
Entity List Template – Executive Block
EXECUTIVES:
- Name: Sarah Chen
Title: CEO, Acme Robotics
Name variants: "Sarah Chen", "S. Chen" (in bylines only)
Disambiguators: must appear with "Acme", "robotics",
"CEO", "founder", or "warehouse automation"
Known aliases: none
LinkedIn URL: linkedin.com/in/sarahchen-acme
- Name: Marcus Oduya
Title: CTO, Acme Robotics
Name variants: "Marcus Oduya", "Marcus O."
Disambiguators: must appear with "Acme", "CTO", "engineering",
or "fleet operating system"
- Name: Priya Vasquez
Title: Chief Communications Officer, Acme Robotics
Name variants: "Priya Vasquez", "Priya V."
Disambiguators: must appear with "Acme" or "communications"
OPTIONAL - Board members and investors to monitor:
- Name: Daniel Park
Role: Board member, Horizon Capital
Disambiguators: must appear with "Acme" or "Horizon Capital"
Save this entity list in a place you can easily update – a Notion page, a Google Doc, a text file in Google Drive. You will reference it in every step that follows. When someone joins or leaves the leadership team, you update this file. That is the single maintenance chore for this workflow.
Why disambiguators matter more than exact-match rules
You might be tempted to just search for the full phrase “Sarah Chen CEO Acme” and call it a day. The problem is that real coverage rarely mentions all three in the same sentence. A reporter might write “Chen, whose company makes warehouse robots, said…” – a match you would miss with a rigid exact-match query. Disambiguators work as a soft filter in the classification step (Step 3), not as a hard search constraint. You cast a wider net during collection, then let the AI verify context.
Step 2: Collect Mentions From the Right Sources
This is where most DIY monitoring setups fail. People default to Google Alerts, get frustrated by the patchy coverage, and give up. Google Alerts is a decent starting point but it should never be your only source. Here is the stack I tested, ranked by coverage-to-effort ratio.
Recommended Source Stack – Free and Near-Free
Tier 1 – Start here (free, covers 70 percent of English-language news):
- Google News RSS – The most overlooked free source in the entire monitoring space. Google News exposes an RSS feed for any search query. Build one feed per entity using a query like
https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Acme+Robotics%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en. This pulls structured headlines, snippets, timestamps, and source URLs. Free. No API key. - Bing News Search API – Microsoft’s news search has better coverage of mid-tier trade publications than Google in my testing. Free tier gives you 1,000 calls per month, which is plenty for a daily monitoring workflow. Requires an Azure account.
- GDELT Project – A free global news monitoring database that indexes news in 100+ languages. It is overkill for a small brand but excellent for companies with international exposure. API returns JSON.
Tier 2 – Add for fuller coverage:
- NewsAPI.org – Aggregates 80,000+ news sources. Free tier: 100 requests per day, 24-hour delay on results. Paid tier starts at $449/month and removes the delay. For most monitoring workflows, the 24-hour delay is acceptable.
- RSS feeds from the specific trade publications your industry cares about – Every major trade pub still publishes RSS even if they bury the link. Ten or twelve targeted RSS feeds often outperform a generic news aggregator.
- Reddit via the Reddit API – If your industry has active subreddits, pull mentions from there. Reddit often breaks stories days before trade press catches them.
- YouTube Data API – Free tier. Search for your entity names in video titles and descriptions. Catches podcast episodes and creator coverage.
Tier 3 – Add if social coverage matters:
- X (Twitter) API – The paid Basic tier is $200/month and gives you search access. The free tier no longer supports search. If you need X coverage and do not want to pay, use a tool like Typefully or a third-party monitoring dashboard that includes X.
- LinkedIn – No public API for search. The workaround is Google searching with a
site:linkedin.comfilter, which picks up public posts. Imperfect but better than nothing.
Quick-start recommendation
Day one, set up Google News RSS for your company name and each executive name, plus 5-10 targeted trade publication RSS feeds. Nothing else. Run the workflow for a week. You will quickly see which sources produce signal and which produce noise, and you can expand from there. Do not start with seven APIs and three scrapers. That is the fastest way to a workflow that breaks in two weeks and you never fix.
Building a Google News RSS Feed in 60 Seconds
This is the free lunch nobody tells you about. Google News exposes a structured RSS feed for any search query. You can use Boolean operators, date filters, and source filters. For each entity on your list, build one feed URL and add it to your RSS reader (Feedly, Inoreader) or your automation tool.
Google News RSS – URL Recipes
# Basic company name search, US English https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Acme+Robotics%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en # Company OR product name (any match) https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Acme+Robotics%22+OR+%22Acme+Fleet+OS%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en # Executive with disambiguator https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Sarah+Chen%22+AND+(Acme+OR+robotics)&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en # Only results from the last 24 hours https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Acme+Robotics%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&when=1d # Exclude a known false positive https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=%22Acme+Robotics%22+-%22Acme+Brick%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
The pattern is simple: %22 is a URL-encoded quote mark (for exact phrase match), + is a space, and the query syntax is the same as what you would type into Google News directly. Test each URL in your browser first – if the resulting RSS feed opens in your reader and shows recent articles, you are good.
How to Handle Paywalled Coverage (The Honest Version)
This is the part every blueprint on the internet glosses over. A meaningful chunk of high-value media coverage lives behind paywalls – The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Information, Bloomberg, Axios Pro, trade publications like PR Week and Advertising Age. If your CEO gets quoted in the Wall Street Journal and you never see it because the article is behind a paywall, your monitoring workflow just failed.
Here is the honest answer on how to handle this. There are four legitimate paths. Each has trade-offs.
What not to do
Do not build anything that scrapes paywalled content, routes traffic through an archive.today-style bypass, or uses a headless browser to defeat access controls. Setting aside the copyright and terms-of-service problems, it breaks constantly and puts your brand in an awkward legal position if anyone asks how you got the article. A clean workflow uses approved access paths – licensed tools, publisher alerts, or public snippets – and that is the end of the list.
If the article matters enough to read in full, ask a team member who has a personal subscription to screenshot it, or pay for the individual article. Some outlets (WSJ, NYT) sell one-off article access for a few dollars.
The practical recommendation: combine Paths 1, 2, and 3. You will catch 95 percent of coverage that matters for a mid-sized company. Only add Path 4 if you have specific publications that are critical to your business (financial media, for a public company; trade pubs, for regulated industries) and the free paths consistently miss them.
Step 3: The AI Classifier Prompt – Relevance, Sentiment, and Topic Tags
Now the interesting part. You have a pile of raw mentions from multiple sources. Maybe 50 items on a slow day, 300 on a noisy day. Most of them are not actually about your company or your executives. Your job is not to read all 300 – it is to have the AI read them and send you only the ones that matter, tagged and summarized.
Here is the classifier prompt I use. Drop this into ChatGPT, Claude, or the AI module in Make or n8n. The prompt takes your entity list and a batch of mentions, and returns a structured output your automation can route.
Media Mention Classifier – System Prompt
You are a media monitoring analyst reviewing news mentions for a US-based company.
Your job is to review each item in the input list and return a structured JSON array with one object per item.
COMPANY AND EXECUTIVE CONTEXT:
[PASTE YOUR ENTITY LIST FROM STEP 1 HERE]
FOR EACH ITEM, DETERMINE:
1. is_relevant (boolean)
- TRUE if the item is actually about the company or a listed executive
- FALSE if it is a false positive (different company, different person, unrelated context)
- Use the disambiguators in the entity list to decide borderline cases
2. relevance_confidence ("high", "medium", "low")
- "high" = the entity is clearly named with matching context
- "medium" = the entity is named but context is ambiguous
- "low" = the entity might be mentioned but the match is uncertain
3. mention_type (pick one)
- "feature" = the company or exec is the main subject of the article
- "quoted" = an exec is quoted as a source
- "passing" = briefly mentioned in passing
- "list_inclusion" = included in a list or roundup
- "announcement" = press release or funding/product news
- "competitor" = article is about a competitor and mentions our company for context
4. sentiment ("positive", "neutral", "negative", "mixed")
- Base this on the tone toward OUR company specifically, not the article overall
5. topic_tags (array of 1-3 short tags)
- Examples: "funding", "product launch", "leadership", "regulation",
"partnership", "controversy", "earnings", "hiring", "industry trend"
6. executive_mentioned (string or null)
- Name of the specific executive mentioned, if any
7. one_line_summary (string, under 25 words)
- Write a neutral, factual summary of what the article says about our company
- Do NOT copy sentences from the source. Paraphrase.
8. urgency ("high", "normal", "low")
- "high" = anything negative, any crisis signal, any exec quoted, any major announcement
- "normal" = standard coverage, routine mentions
- "low" = passing references, old news resurfacing, list inclusions
OUTPUT FORMAT:
Return ONLY a valid JSON array. No preamble, no explanation, no code fences. Example:
[
{
"source_url": "...",
"headline": "...",
"publication": "...",
"published_at": "...",
"is_relevant": true,
"relevance_confidence": "high",
"mention_type": "quoted",
"sentiment": "positive",
"topic_tags": ["product launch", "funding"],
"executive_mentioned": "Sarah Chen",
"one_line_summary": "...",
"urgency": "normal"
}
]
RULES:
- If you are unsure whether an item is relevant, set is_relevant to false and relevance_confidence to "low". Better to miss a borderline match than to flood the briefing with false positives.
- Never fabricate URLs, publications, or quotes.
- If a field is unknown, use null. Do not guess.
INPUT ITEMS:
[PASTE THE RAW MENTIONS FROM STEP 2 HERE]
A few things about this prompt that matter. First, it explicitly tells the model to prefer false negatives over false positives. A monitoring feed that misses one borderline item per week is fine. A feed that includes five false positives per day will get ignored within two weeks. Second, the structured JSON output is what makes the rest of the automation work – your downstream steps can route items by urgency, filter by sentiment, and group by topic. Third, the disambiguator rules in your entity list do the heavy lifting for relevance decisions, which is why Step 1 matters so much.
Model choice: Claude Sonnet 4 vs ChatGPT for this step
I tested both. For structured classification tasks like this, Claude Sonnet 4 is more consistent – it follows the JSON output format more reliably and is better at admitting uncertainty (which is exactly what you want for a filter). ChatGPT 5.3 is faster and cheaper but occasionally returns extra commentary around the JSON, which breaks downstream parsing. If you use ChatGPT, add “Return only the JSON array. Do not include any text before or after the JSON.” as the very first line of the prompt. That usually fixes it.
Step 4: De-Duplicate and Write the Daily Briefing
A hot story gets covered by a dozen outlets within hours. The Associated Press writes it, and then Reuters rewrites it, and then twenty local papers republish the AP version with a local headline. Your classifier will flag all of them as relevant. Your briefing should mention the story once, not twelve times.
The deduplication logic is simple enough for AI to handle in a second pass. Here is the briefing prompt that does both deduplication and the final write-up.
Daily Briefing Writer – System Prompt
You are writing a daily media briefing for the communications team at [COMPANY NAME]. INPUT: A JSON array of classified news mentions from the last 24 hours. YOUR TASK: 1. Group items that cover the same underlying story. Items are the same story if they share a subject, a central fact, and are published within 48 hours of each other. Keep the earliest source as the primary link and list the others as additional coverage. 2. Drop items where is_relevant is false or relevance_confidence is "low". 3. Organize the remaining items into this structure: ## Daily Media Briefing - [Date] ### At a Glance Three bullets that a busy CEO can read in 20 seconds: - Total relevant mentions today - The single most important story - Anything urgent that needs a response ### High Priority Items marked urgency: high. For each: headline, publication, one-line summary, link, sentiment. Group by story if there are duplicates. ### Standard Coverage Items marked urgency: normal, organized by topic tag. Brief - one line per story. ### Passing Mentions Items marked urgency: low. List format only - headline and publication. No summary. ### Executive Coverage A separate section listing every item where executive_mentioned is not null, grouped by executive name. This makes it easy for each exec to see their own coverage. ### Sentiment Snapshot A one-line summary: "Today: 12 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative. The negative item is [brief description and link]." RULES: - Write in a neutral, factual tone. No hype, no alarm. - Never copy sentences from source articles. Always paraphrase. - If sentiment is negative or there is a crisis signal, flag it clearly at the top. - Keep the total briefing under 800 words unless there is unusually heavy coverage. - Format in clean Markdown that renders in Slack, email, and Google Docs. - Use US date format (April 7, 2026) and US spelling. INPUT: [PASTE THE CLASSIFIED JSON FROM STEP 3 HERE]
The briefing format above is what I use in production. The “At a Glance” section is the critical piece – it is the only thing most executives will read. Everything below it is for people who want to dig in. Resist the urge to add graphs, emojis, or a fancy HTML layout. A clean Markdown document that renders the same in Slack, email, and Notion is worth more than any dashboard.
Step 5: Automate the Whole Thing With Make or n8n
Once your prompts consistently produce good output (give it three or four manual runs), it is time to automate. Both Make and n8n handle this workflow cleanly. I default to n8n for media monitoring because it has better native support for RSS feed parsing and JSON transformation, but Make works fine and has a gentler learning curve.
n8n Workflow – Node by Node
Node 1: Schedule Trigger
Set it to run once daily at 7:00 AM in your local time zone. For high-stakes brands (public companies, crisis-prone industries), set it to every 2-3 hours instead.
Nodes 2-N: RSS Feed Reader (one per feed)
Add one “RSS Feed Read” node per Google News query and per trade publication feed. n8n makes each feed a parallel branch. Configure each node with the feed URL you built in Step 2. Set the filter to only pull items newer than the last run.
Node M: Merge
Add a “Merge” node to combine all the RSS branches into a single stream of items. Use “Append” mode.
Node M+1: Deduplicate by URL
Add a “Remove Duplicates” node that matches on the link field. This strips obvious duplicates before you spend AI tokens on them. Rough deduplication at this stage saves real money.
Node M+2: Format for Classifier
Add a “Code” or “Set” node that shapes each RSS item into the format your classifier prompt expects: { source_url, headline, publication, published_at, snippet }. Aggregate all items into a single JSON array to pass to the AI.
Node M+3: AI Classifier
Add an “Anthropic (Claude)” or “OpenAI” node. Paste the classifier prompt from Step 3 in the system field. Map the formatted JSON array into the user message. Set output to JSON.
Node M+4: Filter Relevant Items
Add a “Filter” node that passes through only items where is_relevant == true and relevance_confidence != "low". Everything else gets dropped.
Node M+5: AI Briefing Writer
Add a second AI node with the briefing prompt from Step 4. This one deduplicates by story, groups by urgency, and produces the final Markdown briefing.
Node M+6: Deliver
Add a “Slack – Send Message” node or “Gmail – Send Email” node. Map the briefing text as the body. For Slack, use a dedicated #media-coverage channel. For email, send to your comms team distribution list.
The Make version of this workflow follows the same pattern with “scenarios” instead of “workflows” and “modules” instead of “nodes.” The main difference is that Make handles parallel RSS feeds with a “Router” module instead of native branching. Functionally identical.
For the tech-curious: the API-level alternative
If you are comfortable with Python or Node, you can build this workflow as a single script running on a cron schedule instead of using Make or n8n. The core loop is: fetch RSS feeds with feedparser (Python) or rss-parser (Node), deduplicate by URL hash, call the Anthropic or OpenAI API with the classifier prompt, parse the JSON response, call the API a second time with the briefing prompt, and post the output to Slack via webhook. The whole thing runs in about 150 lines of Python and costs under $5 per month to run on a free-tier VM. The no-code version in this blueprint is the faster path for most people, but the script path gives you more control over rate limits, error handling, and multi-language coverage.
Example: What the Briefing Actually Looks Like
Here is a realistic briefing the agent produced during testing, using the fictional Acme Robotics entity list from Step 1. The input was 47 raw mentions pulled from Google News RSS, Bing News, and three trade publication feeds over a 24-hour period.
The raw input was 47 items. The briefing is built from 14 relevant items grouped into 6 stories, with 23 duplicates and 10 false positives dropped. A comms lead reading this at 7:05 AM knows exactly what is happening and what to flag for the CEO. That transformation – from 47 raw items to a 6-story briefing – is the whole job of the agent.
Common Failure Points and How to Fix Them
Failure Points and Fixes
Problem: The briefing is flooded with false positives about a company that shares your name.
Fix: Update your entity list exclusions. Add the specific competing names as exclusion terms. Re-run one day of mentions and verify the classifier now drops them. If false positives keep appearing after that, the problem is usually that your disambiguators are too weak – add more.
Problem: The classifier returns invalid JSON and the automation breaks.
Fix: Two fixes in order. First, switch to Claude Sonnet 4 if you are on ChatGPT. Second, add a “Code” node after the AI step that uses JSON.parse() inside a try/catch and routes invalid responses to a retry branch. In n8n, you can also force JSON output mode on the AI node, which mostly eliminates the problem.
Problem: The briefing misses obvious major stories.
Fix: This is usually a source coverage problem, not an AI problem. Check whether the missed story appeared in any of your RSS feeds at all. If not, add a feed that covers that publication. Google News RSS is wide but not comprehensive – add direct RSS feeds for the 5-10 publications that matter most to your industry.
Problem: Deduplication is too aggressive and drops distinct stories.
Fix: The briefing prompt groups stories that share “a subject, a central fact, and a 48-hour window.” If it is merging things that should stay separate, add an instruction: “Treat stories with different central claims as distinct, even if they share a subject.”
Problem: Your Anthropic or OpenAI costs spike unexpectedly.
Fix: Add the URL-level deduplication node earlier in the pipeline (before the AI call). Also check whether any of your RSS feeds are returning hundreds of items per run – usually a bad filter. A reasonable daily volume is 20-100 raw items; anything over 300 means one of your queries is too broad.
Problem: The Google News RSS feed suddenly returns zero results.
Fix: Google occasionally rate-limits or rotates its RSS endpoints. Test the feed URL directly in a browser. If it shows results in the browser but returns empty in automation, add a realistic user-agent string to your HTTP request. n8n and Make both let you set custom headers on RSS nodes.
What This Workflow Costs
Monthly Cost by Setup
| Component | DIY (Free Sources) | DIY Plus Automation | Hybrid with Licensed Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| News sources | $0 (Google News RSS, Bing, trade RSS) | $0 | $800-1500/mo (Meltwater or Cision) |
| AI classifier + briefing | $20/mo (ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro) | $5-15/mo (API usage) | $5-15/mo (API usage) |
| Automation tool | $0 (manual) | $0-24/mo (n8n Cloud or Make) | $0-24/mo |
| Delivery (Slack/Gmail) | Existing | Existing | Existing |
| Total | $20/mo | $5-40/mo | $800-1540/mo |
| Paywall coverage | Headlines only | Headlines + pub alerts | Full text, including print |
The DIY path costs about $240 per year for a workflow that covers most of what a mid-sized comms team needs. The enterprise tools cost $10,000 to $18,000 per year and include licensed paywalled access, historical archives, print coverage, and dedicated support. If you are a PR agency with multiple clients or a public company with disclosure obligations, the enterprise tools are worth the spend. If you are an in-house comms team at a Series A or Series B startup, the DIY path gets you 80 percent of the value for 2 percent of the cost. The hybrid path – enterprise tool feeding the same AI classifier – is where a lot of larger teams land once they realize the enterprise tool surfaces the coverage but still leaves them drowning in volume.
Field Notes From Running This in Production
A few things I learned testing this workflow over six weeks that are worth knowing before you build your own.
The first week will be painful. Your classifier will miss things, flag the wrong things, and generate a briefing that reads like a party everyone was invited to. This is normal. Log every false positive and false negative for the first seven days. At the end of the week, update your entity list and the classifier prompt with what you learned. After one iteration, quality jumps dramatically. After two iterations, it is good enough to run on autopilot.
Urgency detection is the feature executives actually notice. When I first deployed this, I spent a lot of time tweaking sentiment accuracy. Nobody cared. What people noticed was that the “high priority” section surfaced the one story that mattered out of 50. That single feature – correctly flagging the urgent item – is what justifies the workflow. Spend time on the urgency rules in the classifier prompt. Get them right and the rest is garnish.
Do not try to track sentiment trends over time unless you have at least 100 mentions per week. Below that volume, the sentiment distribution is too noisy to mean anything. Your team will look at a “sentiment trend line” that is bouncing around for statistical reasons and ask questions you cannot answer. Just report daily sentiment counts and leave the trend analysis for monthly or quarterly reviews.
Executive tracking works best when each exec gets their own feed. I started with one combined briefing. The CEO and CTO each asked to see only their own mentions. Solution: the same pipeline, but the delivery step sends a filtered version of the briefing to each exec’s personal Slack DM or email. Same data, three views. Takes five minutes to set up in the automation tool.
The classifier sometimes misreads sarcasm in headlines. Trade press loves a sarcastic headline. “Acme Robotics Solves the World’s Problems, Finally” might be a glowing feature or a takedown piece – the headline does not tell you which. For headline-only sources (Google News snippets), the classifier will guess and sometimes get it wrong. The fix is to add a rule to the classifier prompt: “If the headline tone is ambiguous and you only have the headline, set sentiment to ‘neutral’ rather than guessing.” This cuts sentiment errors roughly in half.
What to Build Next
Once your media monitoring agent is running, you are sitting on a pattern that applies to several adjacent workflows. Here are the natural next steps.
Competitor monitoring. Duplicate the workflow with a different entity list – competitors’ company and executive names. Run it on the same schedule. Now you have a daily brief on both your coverage and your competitors’ coverage, which is exactly what your CEO asks for at every board meeting.
Crisis detection with alert thresholds. Add a branch after the classifier that triggers an immediate Slack alert (outside the daily briefing) if any single item has sentiment “negative” AND urgency “high” AND mention type “feature.” This catches crises in near real time without flooding your team with every minor negative mention.
Weekly and monthly rollups. Store each daily briefing in a Google Doc or Notion database. Point a second AI workflow at the stored briefings once a week and once a month to generate trend reports: coverage volume, top topics, sentiment distribution, share of voice vs competitors.
Journalist relationship tracking. Extract the byline from every relevant story. Build a database of which journalists cover your company, what angles they take, and how often they mention you. This is the beginning of a DIY Muck Rack.
Tools Used in This Blueprint
| Tool | Role | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Google News RSS | Primary news source | Free |
| Bing News Search API | Secondary news source | Free tier (1,000 calls/mo) |
| Trade publication RSS feeds | Industry-specific coverage | Free |
| Claude Sonnet 4 or ChatGPT 5.3 | Classifier and briefing writer | $20/mo subscription or $5-15/mo API usage |
| n8n (self-hosted or Cloud) or Make | Workflow automation | Free – $24/mo |
| Slack or Gmail | Briefing delivery | Existing plan |
| Optional: Factiva, Nexis, Cision, Meltwater | Licensed paywalled content | $10,000+/year |
Blueprint in the AI Automation Blueprints series.
Every blueprint is co-authored with AI and tested by me. Last updated April 2026.

